In the
article “Explosive growth in Asian cities: Bright ideas to 'seize the urban
moment’” by Khanna (2015) mention that Asian cities have become the icon of the
world's urban development trend within this decade. Asian cities are having
population influx which forces cities to expand and reactive policies to
population growth and global warming are insufficient. South-east Asia cities
tackle this problem with their “flexible governments, resourceful citizens and
local infrastructure innovation." It is also a challenge for huge cities
to provide essential services. The author highlights that city governments
should be “generative” and not only invest in infrastructure but also use it to
produce innovative “business models” that help economy growth. South-east Asia
cities are becoming the icon of urban development in this century.
He
emphasizes in the article that the both Asia and Southeast Asia government
needs to do more for their countries or cities and make use of the opportunity when
urbanization takes place. He also acknowledges
that Southeast Asia government of their effort in resolving the problem due to
the sudden surge of population growth and the rapid urbanization in the cities but
the truth is many Southeast countries cannot handle this rapid urbanization. These
countries not only do not have the resources but also the man power to handle such
situation. Therefore the idea that South-east Asia countries can get hold and
improve using this urbanization opportunity is inaccessible as many of the
South-east Asia countries are poorer in nature and cannot keep up with the
stress from the impact of the urbanization.
Firstly,
the article examines three Southeast Asia countries which follow by the
different strategies approach that are use to allow the countries to continue
to improve. The writer also talks about problems that these countries face due
to the problem from urbanization like the need of housing and water. Countries
can be seen that they are not capable to handle such social challenges. It will
then force the city governments to address these social challenges: to bring
about, almost immediately, while mitigating and adapting to the changes. With
the population growing everyday and the demand of essential need grows, more
social challenges will pop out. Therefore, I believe that these South-east
Asia countries without the resources and the
man power to handle such challenges; they will suffer
even more as times goes by.
Secondly,
he writes in the article that the using of the advance technologies can help
decrease the impact of such social issues arises from urbanization. The writer
uses Jakarta as an example in his article in which Jakarta is taking advantage
of a “crowd-sourcing mobile application” called QLUE that allows their residents
to report to the authorities on any local matters such as flooding, waste
collection or traffic to the government immediately. Another similar mobile application,
Cepat Respon Opini Publik, can help notifies the nearest and most relevant
government officials to the QLUE reports that were generated by the residents and
allows city government officials to respond directly to the public. But not all
countries can use these advance technologies to their advantages as there are huge differences
between countries, in terms of economic performance, governance practices and
cultural behavior. Therefore I believe that the using of the advance technologies
may not be suitable to all countries especially to those poorer ones.
Finally,
rapid urbanization can lead to serious difference be it in society or the
balance in the economy. The raise of population from urbanization may grow
faster than the economy to handle; or the economy may grow but it does not mean
reducing of the poverty in the country or city. This may due the local
governments lacking in “urban management capacity” to make these areas to function
efficiently and to protect the citizens from all the problems.
In
conclusion, the article did emphasize on a few valid point on the different way
how countries can make use of this opportunity to improve. But the
writer mainly talks about the good points that will bring to the Southeast Asia
countries yet he did not really touch on the difficult aspect that would bring
to the countries when urbanization takes place. Only with government that has
good knowledge on how to handle such problem, whether it is with the advance technologies
or not, urbanization will not be a bad thing after all.
(599
words without summary)
References
Article:
Khanna , P. (2015).
Explosive growth in Asian cities: Bright ideas to 'seize the urban moment'. Straits
Times. Retrieved June 11, 2015 from
http://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/explosive-growth-in-asian-cities-bright-ideas-to-seize-the-urban-moment
Resources:
Yuen.B &
Kong.L. (2009). Climate Change and Urban Planning in Southeast Asia. Sapiens Revues.
Retrieved December 18, 2009 from https://sapiens.revues.org/881
Yap , K .S.
(2010). Urban Challenges in South-East Asia. ResearchGate. Retrieved September
26, 2015 from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 236142386_ Urban_Challenges_in_South-East_Asia
Hello jason,
ReplyDeleteI have read your reader respond and which got me intrigued. So I posted some counter argument under.
paragraph 2
Firstly, you mentioned that urbanization from a poorer country should be control. They do not have the necessary resources and infrastructures. I believe a country have to go through urbanization to have stronger economic to be able to build the necessary resources and infrastructures. I guess, it goes both way. Strong economic need urbanization and vice versa.
paragraph 3
what are the social challenges that you mentioned? I agreed with your last sentence about how the problems in South-east Asian will only snowballed if they continue what they are doing.
paragraph 4
I agree with your idea behind how country that uses technological application like QLUE could only be a next step idea if the country is catching up with the use of such technology.
This paragraph has a lot of good idea but perhaps you could be more specific when you mentioned "huge differences between countries, in terms of economic performance, governance practices and cultural behavior."
In your last paragraph, I am not sure whether you agreed with the author.
overall, good work!